Author Topic: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device  (Read 5717 times)

Offline jspell

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
    • View Profile
  • Your Best Time: 7.48 / 178
  • Your Track: Maple Grove Raceway
  • Your Vehicle: 2014 Ken Keir Dragster
Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« on: July 19, 2016, 04:35:12 PM »
The regs state that a belly pan is to have a "flame retardant absorbable mat"  ( I'm paraphrasing).  What can be used to fulfill this requirement?  A NAPA gray absorbent mat? 

dreracecar

  • Guest
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2016, 06:09:34 PM »
as long as the material itself will not support flame. Generally speaking, no one has ever checked for it other than in the fuel classes. Ran for years with just the lower bag and no filler (would not work with the pan I had) Thru rods out twice, no fire and no leaks

Offline gregm784

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 384
    • View Profile
    • Means Racing
  • Your Engine: 365" GenIV SBC
  • Your Track: Famoso Raceway
  • Your Vehicle: 1997 Stirling 200" FED
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2016, 10:09:57 AM »
I see PigMat in a LOT of belly pans. 

I've never seen them check
Greg
El Dorado County, CA
www.meansracing.com

Offline JrFuel Hayden

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
    • View Profile
    • Hayden Enterprises Speciality Wheels
  • Your Best Time: 6.02, 236 mph, 1/4 in 1973 Div 3 TF Champ
  • Your Engine: SBC, Alky, 403 ci, Best 6.99 @ 190 & 409 Hemi
  • Your Track: Bakersfield
  • Your Vehicle: 225" FED NHRA Heritage Jr Fuel
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2016, 12:24:15 PM »
NHRA only checked for PigMat one time at a Div 7 race, in our car.
Jon C. Hansen

Hayden Wheels

Offline H.G. Wells

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • Your Engine: Mild 383 SBC or 498 blown BBC
  • Your Track: Currently San Antonio, past Amarillo, Ardmore OK, Noble OK
  • Your Vehicle: late 60's FED of unknown origin
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2016, 02:32:06 PM »
Hate to hi-jack, but why would someone prefer a pan over a diaper? Or do some classes require both?

The diaper is a pain to strap on and off I know. No one wants to be on fire or have oil under the tire but wouldn't a pan keep the fire in the car with the driver?
Racecar spelled backwards is racecaR

dreracecar

  • Guest
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2016, 02:53:45 PM »
Some people would rather build a pan that cost $30 in material then buy one that cost $150

Offline H.G. Wells

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • Your Engine: Mild 383 SBC or 498 blown BBC
  • Your Track: Currently San Antonio, past Amarillo, Ardmore OK, Noble OK
  • Your Vehicle: late 60's FED of unknown origin
Re: Gen. Reg 1.8 Belly Pan - Retention Device
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2016, 03:33:57 PM »
Ah, got it. The SFI spec diaper is a little spendy, I ran one from one of the mail order houses till it was ripped bottoming out. New one was sewn out of ballistic nylon a little beefier than the last and I actually thought about building a pan instead.  I can see the benefit to each one.
Racecar spelled backwards is racecaR