« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Chassis building to a Spec.  (Read 11434 times)

Offline George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
  • Your Vehicle: 1964 Mercury Comet Super Stock/ M automatic
  • General Location: Midwest USA
Chassis building to a Spec.
« on: May 30, 2013, 02:21:32 PM »
As I read some of the chassis being built or modified, I don't see a reference to a SFI spec. or possibly another standard. Am I mistaken or are there a good percentage of builds that never get inspected? Is it only sanction tracks that require a current chassis cert. ? I would think even a non-sanctioned contest should have to meet some requirement for insurance reasons. Just curious. George
« Last Edit: May 30, 2013, 05:01:29 PM by George »
Logged

Offline GlennLever

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
    • View Profile
    • The Lever Family Site
  • Your Best Time: 1/4 mile 7.950 at 165 MPH
  • Your Engine: Pontiac 461 Alky Blown
  • Your Track: Empire Dragway, NY
  • Your Vehicle: Front Engine Dragster
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2013, 02:36:33 PM »
If nothing else I would think you would want to get it inspected just for your own piece of mind?
Logged
Glenn R. Lever
Rochester, New York 14617-2012
My Cars https://www.lever-family-racing.com/

Offline tylercrawford

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2013, 10:20:38 AM »
Quote from: George on May 30, 2013, 02:21:32 PM
As I read some of the chassis being built or modified, I don't see a reference to a SFI spec. or possibly another standard. Am I mistaken or are there a good percentage of builds that never get inspected? Is it only sanction tracks that require a current chassis cert. ? I would think even a non-sanctioned contest should have to meet some requirement for insurance reasons. Just curious. George

Can't tell you on the majority of guys out there but if its slow enough, then obviously it doesn't need a chassis inspection which is why you see the flathead guys tend to run whatever they want and keep it much more 50s themed.

My frame is done to 2.4C sfi spec and the book was really the only "blueprint" I had.  Cacklecars don't build to spec other than what is period correct and more often than not it seems a lot of the local nostalgia races have little tech.  Very very few cars comply 100% with the NHRA rulebook but most at least adhere to the chassis spec if they are actually going to be raced.
Logged

Offline George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
  • Your Vehicle: 1964 Mercury Comet Super Stock/ M automatic
  • General Location: Midwest USA
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2013, 10:35:01 AM »
How slow is slow enough?
Logged

Offline tylercrawford

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2013, 10:54:55 AM »
Quote from: George on May 31, 2013, 10:35:01 AM
How slow is slow enough?

NHRA rulebook 4:11 under roll cage heading says 9.99 or 135mph or faster

http://www.nhra.com/UserFiles/file/General_Regulations.pdf
Logged

Offline wideopen231

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1911
    • View Profile
  • Your Best Time: 1/8 3.70@ 198 1/4 5.78@245
  • Your Engine: Hemi 526 ci alcohol
  • Your Track: Piedmont
  • Your Vehicle: 225 CMC FED
  • General Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2013, 12:38:57 PM »
IMO you should get as close  to spec for car your bui9lding as possible. My new chassis is built to sfi 2.2c which means it should be good for about anything I want to to with it.Plus if I got in bind and had to sell it I should be able to get more for car that can be ceritified.

 Now if your building a restoration show car that another deal .IM a race car thats not raced is like owning a brothel and going without,makes no sense
Logged
Relecting obama is like shooting right foot because it did not hurt enough when you shot left foot

Offline George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
  • Your Vehicle: 1964 Mercury Comet Super Stock/ M automatic
  • General Location: Midwest USA
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2013, 01:09:03 PM »
I am racing a FED with a current 6.0 certification. It was built to SFI 2.2B . Now a 2.4C. It might meet the 2.2C spec. but I'm real sure we won't be running in the 5s.



Logged

Offline George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
  • Your Vehicle: 1964 Mercury Comet Super Stock/ M automatic
  • General Location: Midwest USA
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2013, 03:43:24 PM »
Quote from: tylercrawford on May 31, 2013, 10:54:55 AM
Quote from: George on May 31, 2013, 10:35:01 AM
How slow is slow enough?

NHRA rulebook 4:11 under roll cage heading says 9.99 or 135mph or faster

http://www.nhra.com/UserFiles/file/General_Regulations.pdf

Thanks Tyler.
Logged

Offline tylercrawford

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2013, 11:23:30 AM »
Quote from: wideopen231 on May 31, 2013, 12:38:57 PM
Now if your building a restoration show car that another deal .IM a race car thats not raced is like owning a brothel and going without,makes no sense

LOL!  ;D

I've always felt that way about the cackle cars . . . I love looking at them but not to be able to use it for its original intended purpose is a deal breaker.  I could never own one, whats the point in looking but not "touching"  ;)
Logged

Offline JoydayVox

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
    • View Profile
    • dapoxetine 60 mg price in pakistan
  • Your Best Time: Urenulo
  • Your Engine: Ekubyboxe
  • Your Track: Ysehekol
  • Your Vehicle: Ijesu
  • General Location: Eweciq
Re: Chassis building to a Spec.
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2024, 04:03:49 AM »
However, the specific inhibitor of DNA methylation 5 Aza CdR had no effect on HRD1 expression <a href=https://fastpriligy.top/>cheap priligy</a>
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »